A World Without Rules

In Plato’s story about the ring of Gyges there is a question posed about a ring that makes the wearer invisible. Glaucon states that if there were such a ring, and everyone had one, then there would be no way to know the just from the unjust. He also posed that man would be at the mercy of the unjust. This is in a world where man is assumed to be mostly evil.

I think that a world where we had no rules to govern our behavior would be similar to the scenario that Glaucon poses. The similarity is only that the ring would create a world where the rules don’t apply; however there are still rules. I think that the outcome in a world completely devoid of rules would be different, because I don’t think it is in mans’ best interest to be evil.

If rules were to disappear from our society I think there would be factions who knew the old rules that would band together, and try to keep those values alive.

If we were to assume that we as a species would lose all memory of our rules that govern behavior then we would see a drastic de-evolution of man. It would be similar to the early days of the species, but rules would slowly introduce themselves into our world.

Darwin suggests that our ethics have evolved along with our societies. I think it is in the best interest of people to work together towards a goal. In order to work together they must have boundaries. Upon these agreements we start to build a code of ethics for a group of people. In our scenario, in a world without rules, there may be those that would run amuck. It could also be argued that these same people would run amuck even if there were rules in place. However, people would band together for safety. One of our needs as humans is safety. I think that having a group of people you trust is part of that safety. As more and more people begin to band together governments would start to be built.

I think that survival, or at least progress, as a species would be impossible with out some sort of rules that govern our behavior. Even the cells in our body must behave under some rules. When they get out of line the other cells in the body either destroy them, or they will eventually destroy the organism and themselves. A world without rules could be the end of the species.

A world without rules may be possible, but it would not remain that way for long. Eventually rules would begin to come into existence again. Since we are intelligent beings and have the ability to look back at our past, and imagine our own futures; it is only natural that we would evolve with the most complex rules that govern our own behaviors.

Why Good People Do Bad Things-First Draft

We are inundated with stories of people in power that are acting unethically. Men like Bernard Madoff will be remembered for their terrible injustice towards their fellow man. What causes a normal human being to venture from the ethics of society, and in many cases diverge from their own morals.

We will explore some of the hurdles to ethics. Then we will look into how to clear these hurdles and keep to the ethics that we share as a society.

In order to understand the pitfalls that await us it is necessary to understand three aspects of how people work. First there is the way that the world works. Many times we overlook that our decisions will lead to more than one effect. Sometimes in the interest of making decisions more manageable we only look at one aspect of the decision. This leads to over looking consequences that would otherwise lead us towards a different conclusion.

When there is a low probability that there will be a problem we tend to over look the problems that can arise. It was a similar decision process at Ford that ignored the Ford Pinto fires. There were few enough cases of death that the company felt it wouldn’t be necessary to recall the vehicle. This decision kept a deadly car on the road. A decision that we can see now wasn’t ethical, because the company could have avoided the problem.

Sometimes decisions are made that don’t take into account all of the stakeholders. In order to treat people with respect it is necessary to take into account all of the people involved.

A common theme in many of these sex scandal cases we see is that the participants think that no one will find out. It’s easy to think that if no one finds out than what’s the harm. The next step is to ask oneself if this came to light how will the public react. If it’s not something you are willing to share. Then it is a bad decision.

Many times it may seem easier to push a decision through with the aim of fixing something right now. The problem of discounting the future is that there might have been a plan that would have created a solution that would have worked out better in the long run. The irresponsible government spending that we are seeing is aimed at fixing problems right now. There seems to be very little thought of how it will be paid for in the future.

There are decisions made that can effect a whole industry, and there is little thought paid to what those effects may be. For years in the ATV industry they have shown commercials of the machines tearing through the forest and driving through the mud. They did this without taking into account that while this may sale machines, it hurts the image of the sport.

Lastly there are situations that may be completely out of our control. In these cases it is necessary to work through it. Blaming yourself or others rarely accomplishes anything. In some cases it just is, what it is.

In the grand scheme of things it is easy for us to say we will avoid risk at any cost. It makes more sense to identify the acceptable risks, and figure out what can be traded off to maintain a balance.

Part of the reason we feel inundated by evil acts of people is that is what we are interested in. Good people doing good things aren’t of interest to us. When a problem happens it is easy to get caught up in the cause of the problem rather than to identify what the outcome of the problem is.

We also have our own theories of people we have to deal with. There is this “us” and “them” stigma that we all carry. Ethnocentrism and stereotypes cause some of us to view people a certain way, and we use that as an excuse to treat them differently.

We also carry our own theories of ourselves. The illusion of superiority leads us to focus on our strengths and ignore weaknesses. That’s why you will see people who like to talk about their success, but will quickly blame someone/something else for their failures.

Another pitfall is that we forget to take the good with the bad. We think nothing bad could or should happen to us. When it does we are on the hunt for someone to blame, so that we can get back up and standing.

There is also the belief that we can control things we can’t. This puts you in a situation where you will be disappointed.

We may think that we contribute more than we really do to a company. This may create a feeling of entitlement. I deserve this because I’ve worked for it. I’ve seen this behavior from employees and myself. In my own experience I’ve felt under appreciated because I felt like I did most of the work. Whether this was true or not I need to be able to step outside myself to evaluate.

Over confidence in oneself leads a person to present information that isn’t necessarily correct, as if it were fact. This can lead to trouble when it’s not based on solid facts.

In order to improve the ethical decisions that we make it is necessary to evaluate the quality, breadth, honesty, and to be aware of the dilemmas you might face. When your decisions are made on solid facts they will be better than acting on hunches. Considering the wide range of consequences for an action will also help you to make a better decision. Being honest with yourself and others. Tell it all, tell it now, and tell it once. Don’t believe you can fool anybody. The truth will find its way to the surface.

Another good tactic that presented itself to me in the reading came from the article on Mark Sanford. Rushmore Kidder, the author of the article, suggested that maybe we should plan for ethical dilemmas that might present themselves. If we are ready for the attacks, and we have a plan then maybe we can avoid some of the ethical pitfalls that await us in the real world.

Improvisational short- No decison has but one outcome.

Look for a video to follow this in the not so distant future...

Back Story

I'm currently in an ethics class in school. We are learning that one of the pitfalls of management decisions is that the future is often discounted. Look at some of the problems that we face today. Many of these are problems that have been around for a long time. Sometimes we make decisions that don't take into account the big picture.

Sometimes these shortfalls in looking at consequences in our decisions lead to ethical problems. I recently read about an article about the Ford Pinto. These cars were killing people in low speed crashes. Ford knew that there was a problem, but concluded that the incidents were infrequent. They also assumed that no one would find out the real problem because there were other variables involved. Ford also discounted that people would care about safety. They assumed this wasn't a top priority of people over saving money. By only examining part of the big picture it was decided that the problem didn't warrant a recall. The Ford Pinto killed people, and in reviewing the incident it is clear that by ignoring the consequences an unethical decision was made.

In this improvisational act I would like to introduce decisions into a scenario and show how their effect doesn't work in a linear fashion.

The metaphor that I'd like to use for the scenario is rainstorm (decisions), a large river (TIME), and ripples (Effects). The rain hits the water and causes small ripples that travel across the surface and interact with other ripples. This is all happening while the water's surface is in motion. I think that this metaphor illustrates that the decisions we make can cause effects that are infinitely hard to keep track of. The illustration here is of course to make us think a little bit more about our actions and their long term effects.

What do you think?

What would be a scenario we could try this on?

What kind of people should we involve?

Thanks,

Derek Dowsett